a) Cross 1: red X white gives all red - a likely model is that eye color is controlled by one gene which has 2 alleles, red and white; also the red allele's phenotype is likely to be dominant. Therefore, choose appropriate symbols (one letter per gene, capital letter for allele with dominant phenotype):
R - red allele. Dominant phenotype of red eyes.
r - white allele. Recessive phenotype of white eyes.
Cross 1 is then: RR X rr ----> all Rr (all red eyes).
Cross 2 is then: Rr X Rr ----> 3:1 red:white.
The predictions agree with the data, so we are done.
b) Cross 1: long X short gives some long and some short - a likely model is that ear length is controlled by one gene with 2 alleles, long and short. From this data, we cannot determine which allele has the dominant phenotype.
Cross 2: long X long gives some long and some short - a likely model is that the long allele has the dominant phenotype. Therefore, the appropriate symbols are:
L - long allele. Dominant phenotype of long ears.
l - short allele. Recessive phenotype of short ears.
Cross 1 is then: Ll X ll ----> 1:1 long:short
Cross 2 is then Ll X Ll ----> 3:1 long:short
The predictions agree with the data, so we are done.
Cross 1: Blue X white gives all pale blue - a plausible model is that color is controlled by one gene with 2 alleles, blue and white. The color is determined by a semi-dominant mechanism, that is:
B - blue allele. Semi-dominant blue phenotype.
b - white allele. Semi-dominant white phenotype.
Therefore:
BB - blue
Bb - pale blue
bb - white
Cross 1 is then: BB X bb ----> all Bb, pale blue.
Cross 2 is then: Bb X Bb ----> 1:2:1 BB:Bb:bb or: blue:pale:white
The predictions agree with the data, so we are done.
Blood type is determined by one gene that has three alleles:
A - allele with co-dominant type-A phenotype
B - allele with co-dominant type-B phenotype
O - allele with recessive type-O phenotype
a) Cross 1 is then: AA X BB ----> all type AB
Cross 2 is then: AB X AB ----> 1:2:1 types A:AB:B (note skewed ratio with small number of progeny)
b) Cross 1 is then: AO X BO ----> 1:1:1:1 types A:B:AB:O (note skewed ratio with small number of progeny)
The predictions agree with the data, so we are done.
LESSON: In general, given 2 alleles, A1 and A2, each with a different phenotype as a homozygote, there are three formal possibilities for the heterozygote:
heterozygote phenotype type of inheritance
- neither A1 or A2 (whichever is dominant) simple dominance
- neither A1 nor A2 incomplete dominance
- both A1 and A2 co-dominance
Tail-lessness and lethality are controlled by one gene with two alleles:
T allele - dominant tail-less phenotype; recessive lethal phenotype
t allele - recessive normal-tail phenotype; dominant viable phenotype
Therefore:
TT - tail-less and dead
Tt - tail-less and alive
tt - normal-tail and alive
Cross 1 is then: TT X tt ----> all Tt (tail-less)
Cross 2 is then: Tt X Tt ----> 1:2:1 tail-less:normal:dead
The predictions agree with the data, so we are done.
There are two different types of notation for sex-linkage:
X - X chromosome carrying R allele;
dominant red-eyed phenotype
X - X chromosome carrying r allele;
recessive white-eyed phenotype
Y - Y chromosome carrying no eye-color allele
or:
--> equivalent to XX
and
or simply
--> equivalent to XY
Cross 1 is then: XX
cross X
Y ----> 1:1:1:1
XX
(red female): X
X
(red female):
X
Y (red male): X
Y (white male)
Cross 2 is then of two possible types (and there will be equal #s of each type):
XY cross X
X
----> 1:1:1:1
XX
(red female): X
X
(white female): X
Y (red male): X
Y (white male)
XY cross X
X
----> 1:1 X
Y(red male):(X
X
(red female)
The predictions agree with the data, so we are done.
a) sex-linked recessive:
X - X chromosome with normal allele; dominant phenotype
X - X chromosome with disease allele; recessive phenotype
Y - Y chromosome, no disease or normal allele
b) Autosomal recessive:
D - normal allele; dominant phenotype
d - disease allele; recessive phenotype
a) eye color is determined by one gene with
two alleles:
B - dominant blue-eye phenotype
b - recessive brown eye phenotype
tooth length is determined by one gene with
two alleles:
S - dominant short-tooth phenotype
s - recessive long tooth phenotype
Cross 1 is then: BBss X bbSS ----> all BbSs
Cross 2 is then: BbSs X BbSs ----> 9:3:3:1
(B_S_): (B_ss): (bbS_): (bbss)
b) height is determined by one gene with two
alleles:
T - dominant tall phenotype
t - recessive short phenotype
color is determined by one gene with two
alleles:
G - dominant green phenotype
g - recessive yellow phenotype
Cross 1 is then: TtGG X ttgg ----> 1:1 (TtGg):
(ttGg)
Cross 2 is then: TTGg X ttgg ----> 1:1 (TtGg):
(Ttgg)
a) 9 A_B_ purple b) 9 A_B_ purple 3 A_bb red 3 A_bb red 3 aaB_ white 3 aaB_ white 1 aabb white 1 aabb red or: 9:4:3 purple:white:red 9:4:3 purple:red:white
You'd expect: 1 AaBb ??? red + blue = purple??? 1 aaBb blue 1 Aabb red 1 aabb whitebut the AaBb class is missing - AaBb could be dead (all the precursor used up or red + blue is toxic)
RRhh becomes
which means:
Cross 1 is then:
X
---->
Cross 2 is then:
X
---->
Non-recombinant types:
: rough soft and
: smooth hard
Recombinant types:
: rough hard and
: smooth soft
So recombination frequency =
Since the abnormality appears in women, we can rule out Y-linked inheritance.
Since it appears more frequently in men than women, it may be sex-linked
recessive:
X - X chromosome with recessive abnormal allele
X - X chromosome with dominant normal allele
If it were sex-linked dominant:
X - X chromosome with dominant abnormal allele
X - X chromosome with recessive normal allele
This leaves autosomal dominant or recessive.
If it were autosomal recessive:
a - recessive abnormal allele
A - dominant normal allele
Try autosomal dominant and see if it works:
A - dominant abnormal allele
a - recessive normal allele
The results predicted by this model fit the data. Its one weakness is that it requires two non-blood related individuals in the family to introduce the abnormality. This is an unlikely event, but since no other explanation matches the data, we are forced to accept this model in the absence of other evidence.

It might actually be quite difficult to tell the difference between Y-linked and sex-linked recessive. If you found a female member of the family with the disorder, then you could conclude that it was sex-linked recessive. But if you never found an affected female, you couldn't be sure. You could also look at the sons of the various women in the family - if any of them were affected, then it would have to be sex-linked recessive. (Why?)
- l to m: Parental gamete types are:
and
resulting in progeny:
Phenotype Number + m n 0 + m + 899 l + n 901 l + + 0Total parental = 1800
and
, resulting in progeny:
Phenotype Number l m n 99 l m + 0 + + n 0 + + + 101Total recombinant = 200
- m to n: Parental types are:
and
resulting in progeny:
Phenotype Number + m + 899 l m + 0 + + n 0 l + n 901Total parental = 1800
and
, resulting in progeny:
Phenotype Number l m n 99 + m n 0 l + + 0 + + + 101Total recombinant = 200
- l to n: Parental types are:
and
resulting in progeny:
Phenotype Number + + + 101 + m + 899 l + n 901 l m n 99Total parental = 2000
and
, resulting in progeny:
Phenotype Number + m n 0 + + n 0 l + + 0 l m + 0

(a) & (b) The best way to solve this problem is to work out the genotypes of the individuals in the pedigree:

c) To be type B, they must have gotten an
chromosome from mom and a
chromosome from dad.
The recombination frequency (RF) gives the probability of crossover (genetic exchange) between two genes. In the case of individual (3), he can produce 4 types of gametes:
Recombinant Gametes:
probability of
gamete = 
probability of
gamete = 
Non-recombinant Gametes
probability of
gamete = 
probability of
gamete =

Another way to look at it: in order to be diseased and B, recombination must have occurred and since the chance of recombination is 11%, the chance of being B and diseased is 11%.